| Studies of technology integration have demonstrated
that teachers move through a continuum. After they develop
basic skills they progress until they can harness technology as a
valid instructional tool.
3
The same can be observed as educators integrate technology
for the purpose of student assessment. Early computer-based
instruction relied on drill-and-practice software that behaved
much like animated multiple-choice tests. The resulting programs
have earned a reputation for promoting little beyond simple
recall and basic verbal knowledge.
Teacher assessment practice, too, begins with the replication
of known activities, such as recreating existing tests with
the help of a word processor. Teachers who relied on multiple-choice
and short-answer tests prior to using technology
will most likely reproduce those same test formats until
they are more familiar with technology's potential
to create rich learning environments and to measure higher-order
skills.
|
 |
Chad Ellett suggests focusing on the active process of student learning.
4 This
process involves interactions among students, and between students
and teachers. Learning is a social process and, as such, can utilize
technology to evaluate these interactions, their frequency,
intensity, detail, and the knowledge structures formed as a result.
Sophisticated measures that evaluate
the changes in higher-order thinking, communication, research,
and social skills must still be developed.
|