|
Robert Kozma and Edy Quellmaiz
describe the potential of networked technologies to demonstrate
impact.
7
These technologies automatically gather and store data.
You can also use them to analyze data by monitoring access,
types of use, frequency and duration of use, and user reactionsboth for
summative evaluations and formative activities designed to
adapt a program to better achieve desired goals. These
evaluation activities may be used to measure and analyze
the impact on students as well as faculty and staff.
Interactions between staff, professional development activities,
and elements of the curriculum all leave artifacts on a digital
network. Interactions can be analyzed by the number of participants,
frequency of interactions, composition of groups, and focus of
discussion. Curriculum can be judged for quality and alignment with
standards, and compared to student achievement data. Teachers
can further benefit from networked technologies by utilizing templates
for notebooks, journals, and lesson plansall of which can
be captured in a standard form for ease of analysis by evaluators.
Students, too, will leave artifacts on a digital network for
possible analysis. These include frequency data that show which resources
students access and how often. Logs of how students
interact with each other, their teachers, and outside experts
can be stored, and analyses of these interactions may provide
insights into the depth of student reasoning, understanding of
course content, and how well students collaborate with others.
|
Developed to support industry and the corporate world,
Electronic Performance Support Systems (EPSS) hold great
potential for education. These systems provide "just in
time" support to workers who must make decisions about operating
equipment, filling out forms, or completing other tasks.
Common EPSS components include training,
documentation, and help desks.
Barry Raybould writes that these support systems
are not necessarily limited to electronic delivery.
8
He takes a more holistic approach that includes all system elements
to support workers, develop their capacity, and eventually
build both individual and corporate knowledge and capacity.
His Organizational Performance/Learning Cycle Model describes
how the support system can lead to individual learning.
This ability to increase situated learning directly
impacts education and could potentially result in individualized
instruction and assessment. This and other articles, presentations,
and links to Web pages describing performance support engineering
are available from EPSS.com.
|
|