My Courses
syllabus Discussion E-mail resources previous forward

Concerns-Based Adoption Model

Education is often the setting for innovation, whether tied to technology or not. American educators have faced such innovations as open classrooms, new math, block scheduling, and teaming—to name a few. Many innovations come and go and teachers go back to their tried and true methods and wait for the next new craze. What happened to innovations that seemed to hold much promise but never panned out? How will technology-supported innovations in education fare in the tide of ever-changing innovation?

The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) 15 was developed by the Research and Development Center for Teacher Education at the University of Texas at Austin. (For more information, contact the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL) at www.sedl.org) It has been used successfully to implement change in settings across the world. The CBAM is based on the premise that the single most important factor in any change process is the people involved and affected by the change. Evaluations of an innovation that do not consider whether the change was implemented correctly or to what degree the change has taken place can lead to distorted results.

From their years of research and experience with implementing the CBAM, the developers note the following about change:

  • Change is a process, not an event. Change occurs over time, often several years, and cannot be "handed off" or implemented like turning a key or a switch.
  • Change is accomplished by individuals. Change is often conceived and presented in ambiguous, impersonal terms. In reality, change affects people and the way they act, think, and believe. Successful innovations must consider the role of individuals.
  • Change is a highly personal experience. People will react to change differently and their actions will not all be the same.
  • Change involves developmental growth. People express their reactions to change in terms of their own feelings and skills.
  • Change is best understood in operational terms. People will relate to change in terms of what it means to them. Change facilitators should address questions in concrete, practical terms.
  • The focus of facilitation should be on individuals, innovations, and the context. Change will only occur when people alter their behavior. Notions about the rate of change, strategies and procedures, and even what success means may alter as behaviors change.
The CBAM is not prescriptive but provides a framework for facilitating change. The model was originally conceived and tested in numerous schools and can be adapted to any type of innovation, such as integrating technology. The model notes that successful change management requires that a skilled facilitator be designated and ready to support the change effort. Training is required to fully implement all facets of the CBAM as a "change facilitator;" however, the model is composed of three major components:
  • The Innovation Configurations Component Checklist (IC Checklist)
  • Stages of Concern (SoC)
  • Levels of Use (LoU)
The model also provides suggestions for strategies to support individuals as they go through change.